sidenote and possible unpopular opinion: I think self insert OCs and “Mary Sues” etc are a vital part of growing as a creative person and moreover, are effectively harmless and fun
Looking back, I don’t understand the fanfic community’s straight up abhorrence of self insert OCs. I write fiction and nonfiction now and the characters who have a little part of me are the strongest most developed parts of every story.
Why do we hate on fanfic authors, especially those starting out who don’t know how to craft characters yet (and do any of us ever really learn), for writing what they know? Fanfic allows writers to explore techniques in an established world with established characters. It allows them to stretch their muscles without forging a new path through the woods. Why we gotta hate on them for using shoes they’re used to?
Not as often as they probably should – because some authors are rightly afraid of it, mostly due to the fact that no one actually knows how to give constructive criticism.
But Aria, you might say, there were things wrong with this fic! And I liked things about it too, but the author might want to know what those wrong things were!
You’re right. They MIGHT want to know. M I G H T
This isn’t a high school english class. If they aren’t actively inviting criticism, don’t fucking give it (and I’m not talking about spelling or grammar mistakes here). I’m talking about criticism to their characterization of characters. Or of the way a fic is written, or the POV of it’s in.
If people don’t invite the criticism, don’t give it. It’s that simple. Some people don’t give a shit, and considering none of us are getting paid to write fanfiction, sometimes we don’t give a flying fart in space if our characterization is right. We just wanna write the story. (If Authors want it, they should actively advertise that fact.) Here’s an example of what is at the bottom of every single one of my AO3 fics:
Excellent!
Going back to your question! “But Aria, there were things wrong with this fic! I liked things about it, but they wrote Dean completely wrong! And they invite criticism, so I’m going to tell them they wrote Dean wrong!”
No, you are going to stop right fucking there and think about that for a second.
1. Dean Winchester is a very, very complicated character at BEST when it comes to writing him.
2. The only person on the PLANET who could tell you that you are writing Dean wrong is….. WAIT. THERE ISN’T ANYONE. He’s a television character, and as such, is open to interpretation.
3. This is not your story. Maybe in YOUR story Dean doesn’t act that way. But it’s not your story. So how would you know that Dean was written wrong? Here’s a clue. YOU CAN’T.
4. Why the hell is it your job to tell the writer they did something YOU think is wrong? Why not tell them what you liked instead?
Now, let’s imagine that despite all of this, you still want to tell the author that YOU think they wrote Dean wrong. (Even though it’s not your place to care, and this isn’t your story.) Believe it or not, there is an APPROPRIATE way to offer this information to the author!
Here’s how you offer constructive criticism to authors. Believe it or not, I can sum it up in one sentence.
YOU ASK QUESTIONS
Understand? No?
Here’s how it works. Let’s take the example of wanting to talk to the author about Dean’s characterization that I mentioned above. You liked other stuff about the fic (let’s say you really liked the monster they picked, and their plot had some nice twists!), but you really want to tell them about Dean. Here’s how I imagine you’d write the comment:
“I really liked this fic, but I think Dean wasn’t very…Dean. He didn’t act like himself at all!”
First off, I’m going to speak for every writer here for a second (this is my opinion, but I’ve yet to meet a writer that likes this phrase, so….):
“I really liked this fic, but…” – *AHEM* THIS SHOULD NEVER BE WRITTEN. EVER. EVER.
It’s the fanfic equivalent of saying “I don’t mean to be rude, but…” or “I’m not racist, but…”
DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THAT PHRASE IS BAD NOW? It insults the author, the fic, and their writing. And frankly, saying that you liked the fic in a general sense is not enough to excuse yourself for writing more insulting shit afterward. Which is exactly what you proceeded to do.
Okay, let’s go on to the rest of your comment. “I think Dean wasn’t very…Dean. He didn’t act like himself at all!”
So, I have a severe problem with how VAGUE this comment is (and I get stuff like this regularly), because if you’re looking to help the writer, specifics are KEY. Okay, so outside of that, how is this supposed to help the author? How are they supposed to improve based on your comment? Are they somehow supposed to realize that the right way to write Dean by osmosis? The point of constructive criticism is to help someone GET BETTER. You are doing nothing but tear them apart.
You really want to help someone get better? You ask them questions about the story. About their choices. Understand WHY they wrote something they way they did. Maybe they made a mistake, maybe they didn’t, but it’s their fic, it’s their choice, and you, as the reader offering constructive feedback, should ask questions to understand their intent!
Here’s how your feedback SHOULD have looked:
“I really liked this fic! I enjoyed the monster that you picked and that you had a bunch of plot twists and turns as they did their research! I wasn’t expecting the ending at all, and I thought you did a really good job with it. Was Dean doing all of the research because he lost a bet with Sam?”
You list the positives. You call out what you liked about the fic in SPECIFIC so the author will keep doing those good things. Then you ask the question about characterization (because normally Sam does the research) in a way that promotes conversation about the choice. This opens up a CONVERSATION with the author that will allow you to discuss the choice in greater detail.
THAT IS HOW IT BLOODY WORKS. ASK. QUESTIONS.
But Aria, you might say. I don’t leave comments like that!
Fair enough, but a lot of people do. I’ve gotten two almost exactly like that in the past five days. One of which, after a 127k fic, asked a single sentence question of why people prefer a certain character topping. THAT’S IT.
Hilariously, I don’t prefer that character topping, and told the commenter as much. But do you know how disheartening that is? To put that much effort into a story and then…get that sentence? If I didn’t have as much writing experience under my belt as I do, that could turn me off writing for a while.
I wrote this rant because that DOES happen to people – and the person I once was. People get turned off of writing because of comments like that. I know I used to. All the time. It isn’t our place as readers to DO that to a writer.
Authors are told to have a thick skin. While this is true, and that’s fine? Readers need to learn how to give criticism without fucking insulting someone and their time and effort. Y’all aren’t professional editors and publishers. There’s only a certain level of critique I expect of something that I do for free, outside of a full time job. Remember that. None of us get paid to do this, and we aren’t in English class.
So I’m going to put this out here. Authors? You get a comment like that? You have a comment that makes you feel bad about what you wrote? Or insecure? You come to me. Sometimes readers need to be taught how to comment properly, and I am more than happy to throw salt, shade and some sass at anyone who thinks insulting your time and effort is okay. Okay?
tl;dr (for those of you that want a quick two sentence summary):
Constructive Criticism does not mean giving a list of complaints, it means that you should ask questions to understand why an author made a choice. It was THEIR choice to make, and you can only understand it, and maybe help them see an alternative choice could have been made. MAYBE.
Got it?
Hi @aria-lerendeair! I liked this post, but I thought it didn’t have enough bees in it? I only come here for the bees. Please write more bees next time, kthx.
Why do so many people fail to include enough bees?
Don’t get me wrong, but I thought Aria was a little OOC in this post and frankly the lack of canon compliance with Aria’s overall blog verse did my head in. Otherwise, an excellent post.
I am laughing, SO HARD. Beautiful, beautiful additions to my post, all of you.
(Note: For the people missing the obvious….THESE ARE RELEVANT EXAMPLES OF REPLIES THAT AUTHORS GET THAT ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. AND THEY’RE FUCKING BEAUTIFUL.)
I want to share my very first review on my Great debriel slave!fic of death, as an example of what NEVER to do to an author, especially to an author who’s writing in a language that’s not their first, please, and thank you (also fuck you very much if you do leave those kinds of messages, if you are not fluent in at least one language other than yours you’re not allowed to criticize people’s grammar unless it’s because you want to beta for the person. And still. There’s a way of saying things.)
Here we go, admire the tact:
“
This is unreadable. Grammar errors in just about every sentence, shifting tense and incorrect use of capitalization. Also, the plot and progression do not make sense. Get a beta.”
Obviously, you’re all more than allowed (and encouraged) to go check out the first chapter of this fic (link above), to see if I truly write like shit, or if that particular anon was just having a bad day (they only read the first chapter). The fic has only been beta’d from chapter 10 and on. I’m working on it, so keep in mind it’s been written almost 2 years ago and I now, because of those kinds of comments, have very negative feelings about the beginning of this fic.
claiming that “trigger warnings are censorship” is the biggest reach i’ve seen in a long time. when will people get it thru their heads that giving advanced warning about content isn’t necessarily “no one should watch/read this thing ever” but also so that survivors can be mentally prepared. it doesn’t censor or change the content at all so?? i can’t believe i have to type this out lmao but anyways why does everyone hate trauma victims
If trigger warnings are censorship I guess we don’t need to rate movies
the reason I’ve stopped saying “most men/some white people/many straight people do X oppressive activity” is because if you’re a member of those groups, I want you to sit there and think, “do I do X? am I a part of that? am I an active part of the problem?”
if I say that only most or some people in those groups participates in X, that’s letting you off the hook! that means that you’re not asked to think about your actions and choices! and besides, even if you yourself aren’t doing X, chances are you know at least five people who do. and I want you to think about them too.
being a person who just naturally cries a lot is so embarrassing like
stressed out? cry. confused? cry. happy? cry. emotional movie? cry. scared? cry. you respond to every possible emotion by crying. and you have to tell people not to panic because like? you just cry a lot and not to take it personally but like
the best parts of the “tumblr somehow
made everything ugly for ~20 minutes” fiascos is that we very rarely get any sort of official acknowledgement that anything even happened.
Look either Elementary exists out of some attempt to prove that Holmes and Watson have only ever been just friends or it exists to have Holmes and Watson get together in a way that won’t make homophobes feel uncomfortable, either way the intent is Bad
no offense but id take a genuine relationship between a clearly mentally ill trauma survivor/addict and a well-developed chinese american female doctor character over Bland White Dudes With Fake Homoerotic Tones any day